Essential Partners
·
2026

Bridging the Divide on Firearms Policy: Project Report

Key Finding

A year-long, university-led dialogue between gun owners and non-gun owners produced eight consensus policy proposals, showing sustained cross-partisan dialogue can reach concrete agreement on a maximally polarized issue.

About this research

This report documents a year-long, university-led dialogue process convened by Essential Partners together with Dr. Michael Siegel’s research team at Tufts University School of Medicine, bringing together gun owners and non-gun owners from across the ideological spectrum. Participants engaged in more than 70 hours of facilitated dialogue plus two weekend-long in-person convenings, working to surface common ground on firearms policy. The process produced eight consensus policy proposals aimed at reducing gun violence while protecting individual rights, demonstrating that sustained structured dialogue can reach concrete agreement even on a maximally polarized issue.
Format

Evaluation Report

Year

2026

Published by

Essential Partners, with Dr. Michael Siegel's research team, Tufts University School of Medicine

Category

Effectiveness Evidence

Keep Reading

More research in this category

Study

Reducing Islamophobia: An Assessment of Psychological Mechanisms That Underlie Anti-Islamophobia Media Interventions

Beyond Conflict
·
2023
Key Finding
An intervention tournament testing 11 practitioner-developed videos found that interventions prompting recognition of media bias against Muslims reduced anti-Muslim hostility, both immediately and one month later.
Effectiveness Evidence

Evaluation Report

The Dignity Index Pilot Project Technical Summary

UNITE / Dignity.Us
·
2023
Key Finding
Documents a controlled pilot (Sept 2022) testing whether the 8-point Dignity Index scale can be reliably taught and applied by university students across the political spectrum.
Effectiveness Evidence

White Paper

Searching for a New Paradigm: Collective Settings

More in Common
·
2023
Key Finding
Community “collective settings” built on participatory governance, accountability, and openness to difference and experimentation build democratic capacity more effectively than top-down reform alone, three in-depth case studies find.
Effectiveness Evidence

Join Our Community

Stay current with the field — funding, jobs, news, and events delivered to practitioners.